Sociology of Sex Question…
by Sociology is a Science
I was just briefly at a gathering and I brought this up.
There was some disagreement, so I’m going to pose it here.
It’s a “sociology of sex” question.
We all get infected by bacteria or viruses on occasion.
Sometimes they affect our throat or breathing or mouth. Consider strep throat (bacteria) , the common flu (a virus) or cold sores (virus).
Other times it is the less flattering areas so inflicted. Consider herpes (virus), or chlamydia (bacteria) or syphilis (bacteria).
So if viruses are viruses and bacteria is bacteria…why so much attention to STD’s and STI’s? All day all I seem to hear about is safe sex, use protection, be responsible, make good choices…
Oh, I should clarify…I work on a university campus with these kinds of posters around, I’m not some kind of un-registered sex offender relaying tonight’s (court mandated) sex addicts anonymous meeting.
So my issue is this: why is it that if you found out your upcoming blind date had had a cold sore 6 months ago, it might merit a shrug.
On the other hand, if you were to find out that this upcoming date had herpes, you’d spin around and run away so fast you’d break your own neck.
Is this stigma around sexuality legitimate? Or is this just a social construction?
Are STD’s unduly viewed as awful, terrible and unseemly? Is this a Christian guilt thing?
Or is the idea of sickly genitals somehow biologically hard-wired to produce extra disgust? After all, evolution is a process of gene selection — if what transmits those genes now has oozing bumps because of 1 too many beers and 10 too many Cuban hookers, this might justly influence perceptions of one’s character…
Tell me what you think in the poll below…